Jury Report on Public Hearing on Police Violence in Osmania University, 10th April, 2010
The Public Hearing on “Police Violence in Osmania University” was conducted on 10 April from 11 am to 4.30 pm at OUCIP. The Jury and participants witnessed testimonies on policeviolence against Students in Osmania University Campus, police harassment of faculty and incidents of police brutality in the neighbouring Manikeshwar Nagar basti [Vaddera Basti]. These testimonies, while they generally pertained to the period between 29 November to 9 March, also spoke about six specific incidents of violence -- lathi charge, tear gas and firing rubber bullets - on 29th November, 7th December, 20th January, 14th February and 15th February on the campus and one that happened off the campus, on 9th March.
The hearing was organized and coordinated by the following groups: Hyderabad Forum for Telangana, Civil Liberties Monitoring Committee, Human Rights Forum, Telangana Lawyers Collective and Andhra Pradesh Civil Liberties Committee.
The Jury consisting of Prof. D.Narasimha Reddy, Mr.M.V.Shastri, Prof.Susie Tharu, Prof.Kalpana Kannabiran, Prof.G.Haragopal, Prof.Krishnadeva Rao, Dr.Deeptha Achar, heard nineteen testimonies. It also took into account a) the newspaper reports, b) report of the Assessment Committee of Press Council of India (submitted to the Government of Andhra Pradesh), c) report of the fact-finding committee submitted to State Human Rights Commission, d) Medical record of the injured students prepared by Durgabai Deshmukh Hospital. The following report presents the findings and recommendations of the jury in detail.
I Background - Social profile of the Osmania University students and Telangana agitation
Osmania University has a 10,000 strong student-body of whom more than 75% are first generation learners from largely Backward class and Dalit families of the Telangana region. There are nearly 2000 women students from similar background who stay on the campus. The general profile of the student body in Osmania University (95% SC, ST and BC, according to Rama Melkote) was reflected in the students who deposed before the Jury. Most came from rural and small town areas, one from Hyderabad itself. Except for one, they were all Telugu-speaking, first generation educated, poor. Those who were not accommodated in the hostels had rented shared rooms and found boarding in Manikeswar Nagar, a nearby basti of makeshift housing and small pukka structures.
The overwhelming majority of such students never completes school, let alone makes it to university. Well-documented economic factors and the cultural politics result in such “push-out” (to cite current education theory). The typical OU student therefore is a survivor. In other words, he or she is hardworking, tenacious, one of the few who has the intellectual capability, the personal resilience and the family support that enables survival. They are the cream of a generation.
It should go without saying that such young people represent years of investment from families struggling at the edge of survival. Once at university each carries the weight of having to finish his or her studies, and share the responsibility of earning. The desperation about finding jobs is intense. (Their seriousness is simply not comparable to that of middle-class students in central and other large metropolitan universities, who, given their backgrounds, arrive there more or less by default. For these privileged students, landing a ‘good’ job is a personal achievement, a matter of pride.)
Consequent to the announcement of fast unto death by Mr.K.Chandrasekhar Rao, the Osmania University Student Joint Action Committee (OU JAC) was formed to agitate for the formation of a separate Telangana state. For the Osmania students the separate Telangana demand embodies the promise of a government of their own; one that will be responsible to them and their kind; one that will take seriously the classical governmental task of securing their lives.
Moreover, there is nothing exceptional in Osmania students’ agitation as one of the functions of the university is to nurture healthy democratic life and to train future public intellectuals. History shows that world over students and universities have played an important role in leading public discussion on issues and on precipitating fundamental changes in national life. Examples that come quickly to mind are the University of Paris in the late 1960s, the university campuses in the USA during the Civil Rights movements of the 1960s and 1970s, Tiananmen Square in the 1990s, Mexico, Johannesburg, Beirut.
It is difficult therefore to comprehend why student participant in the Telangana discussion and demand provoked such excessive response from the State and Central Governments and the Police. Why were the democratic aspirations and activity of these students regarded as dangerous and/or illegitimate? Why was it necessary to have barbed wire, police trucks, platoons of armed police and paramilitary personnel stationed on campus over such a long period of time?
II Police involvement, deployment and five police incidents in brief
Right after JAC began their relay hunger strike campaign on 29th November, the Education minister declared an unscheduled vacation for the University and the City Commissioner issued notices to the students to vacate their hostels (Dr.Ansari’s deposition). Several security checks were introduced at both the gates of the campus and bylanes got barricaded with barbed wires.
The following platoons of policemen and paramilitary personnel were deployed on the campus: 3 and a half platoons of Andhra Pradesh Special Police; two platoons of Central Reserve Police Force and three platoons of Central Industrial Service Police along with additional civil police force of two Assistant Commissioners of Police, seven Inspectors including one woman Inspector, 9 Sub Inspectors of Police, 5 Head Constables, 29 Police constables including 5 women. (Information obtained under the RTI)
On 29th November, a police contingent charged at the students gathered at their hostel and beat them without warning. In this incident, many students received lathi blows but three student leaders received blows on every part of the body (M.Lakshmaiah and Advocate .Chandrasekhar’s testimonies) Mr.Stephen Ravindra’s name came up in relation to this incident.
On 7th December, at around 12.00 noon, a large contingent of riot-geared policemen lathi charged the residents of Manikeshwar Nagar in which atleast ten residents were injured. The lathi charge was indiscriminate as people returning from work were dragged and severely beaten, despite repeated requests. Nearly twenty people were charged under criminal offences (Testimonies of Venkatesh, Allakunta Ramulu, Allakunta Gandamma and Andalamma). Mr.Praveen Kumar was in charge of the basti.
On 20th January, during the funeral procession of Mr.Venugopal Reddy from Arts College to the Ladies Hostel from 11.00 AM to 1.30 PM, for which permission was granted by the police, the students were lathicharged, teargassed and fired at simultaneously at Law College and Ladies Hostel. Even though faculty of the University was mediating between the police officials and the student agitators, the police did not allow their efforts to succeed. Despite the presence of a large number of women students in the gathering, no women police were deployed on this day. One student sustained a bullet injury and many sustained lathi blows. Many students and four faculty were charged with several offences including S307 (Testimonies of Shilpa, Dr.Ansari and Agamani and copies of remand diary). Mr.Stephen Ravindra’s name again came up in this instance.
On the evening of 14th February from around 7.00 PM to around 10.30 PM, several groups of students and media personnel were mercilessly lathi charged, tear gassed and fired at, again, without any prior warning whatsoever. Media personnel were beaten up despite the clear evidence of their identity. Women students were particularly targeted and were abused verbally also. Ambulance service was not allowed. The campus was also cordoned off from outsiders. Thirty students were seriously injured, many with injuries on their head and upper part of their body. Women students were beaten on their private parts. One student sustained a bullet injury. (Testimonies of Swapna, Agamani, Shweta, Krishank, Yelender, Naliganti Sharath, MLC Nageshwar and medical reports)
On 15th February, around 10.30 AM, media personnel covering the brewing tension between the police the students were again targeted. The police tried to use one journalist as a human shield even as they beat him. This journalist sustained serious injuries on his head and back. (Testimonies of Aruna and Narsing Goud, Report by the Assessment Committee of the Press Council of India). CI Anjaiah, ACP Ramachandran and ACP Seetharamanjaneyulu’s names were mentioned in the testimonies.
On 9th March, at the premises of Gandhi Hospital, a gathering of students waiting to take out a funeral procession for Mr.Sai Kumar who had committed suicide for Telangana, were again chased and lathi charged. Despite the presence and assurance of the members of the Peace Committee, the students were made to wait for several hours and lathi charged during the funeral procession (Testimonies of Vijay, Upender, Krishank and M.Lakshmaiah).
III Testimonies by students, journalists, faculty and residents of Vaddera basti (Manikeshwarnagar) – Summarized testimonies can be found at the end of this report.
The jury heard the testimonies of Mallepalli Lakshmaiah, Senior Journalist, B. Venkatesh, Resident, Manikeshwar Nagar, Allakunta Ramulu, Resident, Manikeshwar Nagar, Swetha, M.Sc, Pharmaceutical Chemistry Nageshwar, Member of Legislative Council, Andhra Pradesh, Chandrasekhar, Advocate, High Court, Swapna, M.A.Telugu, Narsing Rao, Journalist, Andhra Jyothi, Naliganti Sharath, Ph.D, Telugu, Vijay, Student, OU, Dr. Ansari, Assistant Professor, Linguistics Department, OU, Krishank Manne, LLB, OU, B. Shilpa, M.A. Political Science, Aruna, Reporter, HMTV, Agamani, M.A. Hindi, Upender, Ph.D, Alakunta Gandamma, Resident, Manikeshwar Nagar, Kunsumpu Andalamma, Resident, Manikeshwar Nagar, Prof. Chennabasavaiah, Department of Political Science, OU,
IV Corroborations of Testimonies from other sources
A. Newspaper Reports
The AP State Human Rights Commission on 30 November directed the Director General of Police to instruct the officers to “desist from resorting to violence against students wherever peaceful agitations are taken up at educational institutions”. He also directed that urgent medical aid be provided to those who had already suffered injuries.
(30 November 2009. http://www.thehindu.com/2009/
The lathi charge on campus and neighbouring residential locality of Manikeshwarnagar was condemned by all political parties.
(8 December 2009. http://www.thehindu.com/2009/
In the melee, policemen surrounded M. Narsinga Rao, reporter of ABN Andhra Jyothi TV channel, pulled him off his bike and started beating him up ignoring the pleas that he was a journalist and not connected to the agitation. Showering lathi blows and mouthing obscenities, they used him as a human shield against stone pelting students. Only when other journalists intervened, he was set free.
(16 February 2010 http://www.thehindu.com/2010/
In March 2010, the Press Council of India constituted a four-member assessment committee to enquire into the police assault on media persons on 14 February 2010. The members of this committee, SK Sinha, Kalyan Barooah, K. Srinivas Reddy and K. Ramachandra Murthy, recorded statements of 40 persons, including 16 journalists, 2 ministers, the Home Secretary, Commissioner of Police, SHO-OU and the zonal DCP. This report is awaited.
(09 March 2010. http://www.thehindu.com/2010/
Photographs in Telugu newspapers confirm injuries to students and journalists.
B. SHRC Fact Finding Report
The report of the Fact Finding Committee on Police Brutality on the students of Osmania University Campus submitted to the Chairman of the AP State Human Rights Commission on the 14 February incidents support the testimonies of those who deposed at the public hearing either about injuries they themselves suffered or violence they witnessed being physically present at the place of attack. The Committee concluded that “the police attacked the girls and boy students indiscriminately and have subjected particularly girl students to fear and sexual harassment; that the police deliberately switched off electricity drowning the campus in darkness and attacked the students in a planned manner; that the police indulged in an unprovoked attack, actively created a war like atmosphere on the campus with the sole intention of subjecting the students to terror; that the continuous presence of the police for the last two months has vitiated the peaceful atmosphere conducive to academic pursuits on the campus and that the police camps impede the educational pursuits and free movement of nearly 2500 girl students in the hostels and that the barbed wire fencing and traffic diversions cause immense problems to free movement of the students and the general public”.
C. Medical Reports
Durgabai Deshmukh Hospital and Research Centre
1. Sharath, s/o Keshavulu, aged 25 years, OU Campus Student, admission no 6574, dated 18 February 2010: “trauma to left side of body after being hit by police at 5 pm at OUcampus”.
2. Datrika Swapna, d/o Nagaiah, aged 24 years, OU Campus Student, admission no 6580, dated 14 February 2010: “Laceration of size 2x1 cm over right leg middle 1/3rd; abrasion of size 3x2 over right knee. Movement at knee joint painful” “Alleged hit by police”. Date of discharge 19 February 2010.
3. M. Agamani, d/o M. Kistaiah, aged 29 years, admission no 3577, dated 14 February 2010: “Pain in Right Area; Rt arm contusion. Redness discoloration; tenderness; oedema” “Hit by stick on 14.2.10”. Discharged on 18 February 2010.
4. Kankala Elender, s/o Isthari, OU student, admission no 6493 dated 14 February 2010: “Pain in Rt elbow. Hit by stick. Bleeding. Open wound at elbow. Sutured…4 stitches taken. Case posted for surgery on 16.2.10 at 9.10 am” OP Consultation card: “Pt alleged to have been beaten by police in lathi charge at OU campus on 14/2/2010. Laceration over the Rt elbow”.
5. Ashok, s/o Venkataiah, aged 21 years, admission no 6584 dated 14 February 2010: “Pain in rt wrist. Alleged hit by police. Contusion.
6. MLC No 9012 [name not legible]: “Pt alleged to have beaten by police in lathi charge at OU campus on 14/2/2010.” “trauma to the head. Laceration over the scalp.”
7. MLC No 9016 [name not legible]: “Pt alleged to have beaten by police in lathi charge at OU campus.” “Known asthmatic, came with breathlessness. No external injuries.”
8. MLC No 9018 [name not legible]: “Pt alleged to have beaten by police in lathi charge at OU campus.” “No external injuries. Pt c/o weakness & giddiness.”
9. MLC No 9020 [name not legible]: “Pt alleged to have beaten by police in lathi charge at OU campus.” “No external injuries. Pt c/o weakness & giddiness.”
10. Jhansi: “Pt alleged to have beaten by police in lathi charge at OU campus.” “No external injuries. Pt c/o weakness & giddiness.”
11. MLC No 9027: “Pt alleged to have beaten by police in lathi charge at OU campus.” “Pt has laceration on the Rt limb (?). Abrasion over rt angle..Suturing done.”
12. MLC No 9028: “Pt alleged to have beaten by police in lathi charge at OU campus.” “No external injuries.”
13. Sreevani, aged 22 years, MLC No 9021: “Pt alleged to have beaten by police in lathi charge at OU campus on 14 February 2010. No external injuries. Pain over rt leg.”
14. Ravi, aged 25, MLC No 9026: “Pt alleged to have beaten by police in lathi charge at OU campus.” “Laceration below the left eye. Suturing done.” “Blunt injury over Lt periorbital region and face.”
15. Koteshwari, d/o Pichaiahgaru, student OU campus, MLC No 9019: “Pt alleged to have beaten by police in lathi charge at OU campus. No external injuries. Severe headache.”
16. Nagamani, MLC No 9015: “Pt alleged to have beaten by police in lathi charge at OU campus. No external injuries. Pt complaining of weakness & giddiness.”
17. Anjamma, MLC No 9014: “Pt alleged to have beaten by police in lathi charge at OU campus. No external injuries. Pt complaining of weakness & giddiness. Pain in lower abdomen.”
The students who testified at the Public Hearing spoke about injuries sustained in the course of police action: N. Sharath, Datrika Swapna and Agamani. There is evidence of injuries to these students [1-3 above] and to several other students on OU campus sustained in lathi charge by police, as per records of the Durgabai Deshmukh Hospital and Research Centre.
D. Report of the Assessment Committee of the Press Council of India
Between March 7 and March 9, 2010, the Assessment Committee constituted by the Press Council of India recorded statements by 16 journalists and 5 police officers, besides meeting the Home Minister, Mrs. Sabitha Indra Reddy and the Minister for Tourism, Dr. J. Geetha Reddy. The journalists, who appeared before the Assessment Committee, stated that they were deliberately attacked to obstruct any reporting on the situation in the campus. Having been attacked, the journalists were prevented from lodging complaints in police stations.
Extract from the Report:
“The Committee after hearing all the sides, has come to the conclusion that the incidents of February 14 and February 15 were cases of unprovoked and deliberate attack by the police on the journalists, who had gathered at the Osmania University campus to cover the ongoing agitation by the students. There were ample evidences including video footage submitted by the journalists to suggest that the Police personnel on orders of the superior officials identified and targeted the media persons taking advantage of the surcharged atmosphere prevailing at the University campus”.
After listening to all the sides, the Committee gained the impression that some officers of the police acted with vengeance, perhaps on the assumption that given the surcharged atmosphere that prevailed at that point of time blacking out news coverage of the agitation would prevent further intensification of the movement.
The Jury Concludes:
From the testimonies of those who deposed at the public hearing, newspaper reports and the report of the Assessment committee of the Press Council of India, the following could be clearly ascertained:
a) The primary concerns of the University Teaching, Learning and Research disrupted by the Emergency-like restriction on movement, entry, transit and the diversion of bus services.
Students stressed that while the JAC protests were taking place in front of Arts College, classes continued to be held. Between lectures and students and teacher would sit in at the pandal. The normal life of the university was not affected. “All 3 times examinations were postponed, it because of events resulting from police provocation,” Prof. Chennabasaviah reported.
After the police set up camp, stopped the buses, and made entry and exit difficult, the daily work of the university was badly affected. Students had to walk the entire distance from and to their hostels, their laboratories, classrooms and the library. Women students complained of lewd comments passed by the police personnel who sat there watching as they walked past. Faculty living on the main campus but working in city colleges such as Nizams or Womens who carried ID cards from their colleges, found it difficult to move out of the campus or re-enter. They were humiliated by the police who refused to recognise their bona fide. Teachers and students could not go to libraries, or work late in their laboratories to complete projects due by year end (March 31). Their children had difficulty going to and returning from school. To make matters worse it was exam time. Family shopping for daily necessities became a major exercise.
Their right of the university community to the normal activity of their daily and professional life was curtailed. The university’s life degraded. It would appear that the educational life of the university and the future of these students were not serious matters for those who imposed these restrictions.
B. Universities are autonomous bodies vested with systems of managing small tensions and unrest among the students. Osmania University, with its several active student organizations is not new to political protests and mobilizations and has managed small tensions that are inevitable in such situations. After the Telanagana agitation started, the faculty of the University was willing and available for negotiations in almost all the situations when the police resorted to firing and lathi charge. Among them, Prof. Nageshwar, the current Member of Legislative Council and Prof.Kodandram, the convenor of Telangana Joint Action Committee were also present. On 20th January and 14th February the faculty tried to intervene and mediate between the police officials and the student leaders. On 20th January, the police diverted the vehicle carrying Venugopal Reddy’s body, after permitting the students to take out a funeral procession, after lathicharge, teargassing and firing at them. On 14th February, those students who were in the process of negotiation with the police were themselves hit on their head. On 9th March, the police officials did not heed the Peace Committee which was set up as a result of the efforts of the University and the Andhra Pradesh government.
It appears that the police officials in charge of the Osmania University campus where a large student body was agitating for Telangana were not equipped to handle the situation, despite the best efforts of the faculty and students to extend support in maintaining order.
C. Police Excesses and Police Brutality
Not availing the extended support by the students and the faculty in managing the situation on the University Campus, the police almost always resorted to indiscriminate use of force by aiming at students and later journalists especially, with intent to cause injury. On 29th November, Suman was hit all over his body by lathis. On 20th January, Suneel was hit on his chest by a rubber bullet while many other received lathi blows. On 14th, 23 journalists and more than fifty students were injured. One woman was hit on her leg by rubber bullet; five male students received head injuries; three male students broke their arms and one, his ankle. Many women students did not report their injuries. Many residents of Manikeshwar Nagar basti who received lathi blows could not go to work for several weeks. Students report that the paramilitary forces often mingled with the civilian police during these incidents. The available injury reports, outpatient records and other hospital records clearly point to injuries caused to some students. The government did not offer any medical support to the students for treatment or medicines.
Police violence on 29th November, 7th December, 20th January, 14th February, 15th February and 9th March was unprovoked and disproportionate to the extent of ‘danger’ posed by the students. While student processions and other forms of protests were the order of the day, on these particular days, the police deliberately targeted them. In none of these incidents, rules to be followed regarding lathi charge, tear gas and firing rubber bullets were followed. There was no announcement on the mike for the students to disperse. While these measures need to follow one another, they were done simultaneously. And they were done with the intent to cause injury.
It is a serious lapse of procedure as outlined in 2 I of S.O 885 of the A.P Standing Orders that stipulates “Officers Commanding Police Parties will, on every occasion employed in the suppression of a riot or enforcement of law, ensure that the fullest warning is, if feasible given to the mob in a clear and distinct manner before any order is given to use teargas or lathis or fire-arms and use the most effectual means to explain before hand to the people.. Whenever firing is resorted to, directions and warnings to the mobs should be announced through loudspeakers. Police vehicles should be equipped with loud-speaker arrangements on such occasions and where such arrangements cannot be made hand megaphones should be kept handy” (P.679-680, Andhra Pradesh Police Code, by Padala Rama Reddi, Asia Law House, 1998)
Justice Narasimha Reddy of AP High Court in its Order dated 16th February stated: “The Court is rather astonished to note the way in which, the State Police is reacting even in the orders of this Court, in the context of deployment of police forces in Osmania University Campus. Yesterday, in a different writ petition, relating virtually to the same incident, filed by three girl students and one male student, this Court passed an order, directing the Director General of Police and Commissioner of Police to remove the barricades and withdraw policeforces on the same day. They could have contested the order, by way of writ appeal, even by complying the orders of this Court. However, they have shown their respect to the orders of the Judiciary, by just not caring for them and continuing lathi-charges, one after the other” (WP No.3444 of 2010)
D. Cases on Students, Faculty and Residents of Manikeshwar Nagar: A Clear Instance of abrogation of Fundamental Rights
In the course of three and a half months, nearly 76 cases have been filed against several students, faculty and residents of Manikeshwar Nagar (vaddera basti). The jury examined remand case diaries related to with reference to FIR Nos. 19/2010, 20/2010 and 21/2010 dated 28 January 2010, regarding incidents that occurred on 20 January 2010 near Ladies Hostel Osmania University, names 46 accused including four professors – Prof. Ansari, Prof. Vinod Kumar, Prof. Lakshmi Narayana and Prof. Rathod.
The accused were booked for offences under sections 147, 148[rioting, armed with deadly weapons], 188 [disobedience of order promulgated by public servant], 332 [voluntarily causing hurt to deter public servant from his duty], read with Section 149 [every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object] – the conspiracy provision. In addition the accused were booked under Section 3 of the The Prevention Of Damage To Public Property Act, 1984.
A2 – Palla Rajeshwar Reddy, Chairman of CVSR and Lalitha Group of Colleges, and A3 – Boddu Yellaiah, OU PhD student from Karimnagar district, were arrested for rioting and unlawful assembly. All the remaining accused were “absconding” and efforts were being made to arrest them. Confessional statements recorded by the police, according to the remand case diary, showed that A-2 “instigated the students to attack on the police personnel and set ablaze the police vehicles to show our resentment and to attract the attention of State and Central Governments in order to expedite the process of formation of Telangana State, despite the request made by police officials not to resort to violence.” A-3 “participated in an attack on a Police Constable of OUPS with sticks near Landscape Garden, damaged business establishments…caused damages to private vehicles…on 05.12.2009 along with his friends and students of OU campus after coming to know about the deteriorating health condition of TRS party President Sri K. Chandrasekhara Rao at NIMS hospital in order to put pressure on the State and Central Governments for early formation of Telangana State.” Judicial custody of 15 days was sought as “the accused are capable of threatening and endanger witnesses, obstruct course of fair investigation, endanger peace and public tranquility of the society and to finalise the case.”
It is clear that the common object for which the accused assembled [even while we might dispute the actions listed in the remand diary as they directly contradict all other reports available to us], is the formation of the Telangana state. If this is the case, the assembly cannot be deemed to be an unlawful assembly, as the formation of a separate state comes within the purview of Article 3 and demand for a separate state is within the ambit of Article 19 of the Indian Constitution.
The converse is true from the testimonies especially of the journalists and the findings of the report of the Press Council of India – namely that there was an un constitutional assembly of policepersonnel, pursuing an unconstitutional objective – holding students in custody within a university campus – with every member of the police force guilty of an offence under Section 149 IPC [conspiracy].
The state is guilty of the derogation of Article 19 and 21. There have been assertions by students that they have been targeted even more brutally because of their social background. Given that a majority of the students belong to Dalit communities from Telangana, and that the attacks were only on students belonging to Telangana [established even from the remand case diary of the police], the infringement on the right to liberty by the state is to be read with Article 15 derogations – discrimination on grounds of caste and place of birth.
The Jury Recommends:
a) All cases against the students and faculty of the Osmania University and the residents of Manikeshwar Nagar be lifted by the Andhra Pradesh government.
b) All the students, residents of Manikeshwar Nagar and the journalists who were beaten up and receive other injuries in the six incidents should be provided medical assistance or recompensed for the medical expenses. That they should be compensated for the loss and damage to their vehicles and equipment. And loss of workdays.
c) All the police officers responsible for all incidents of lathi charge, tear gas and firing with rubber bullets on the students, residents of Manikeshwar Nagar Basti and journalists should be held accountable to by the government and disciplinary action initiated against them.
d) That while the University administration could call the local police regarding any incidents, the government should never deploy police on the University Campus. That the government should make use of the mediations by the University faculty and authorities more effectively in cases of mass mobilization by the students.
e) That the University academic schedule should not be disrupted for extraneous reasons by the government.
Copy to
Mrs.Sabita Indra Reddy, The Home Minister.
Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad.
State Human Rights Commission
Posted in Tracking Telangana blog
Comments
Post a Comment